Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 04:03
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Crypto Bros Celebrate Themselves at Bitcoin’s Most MAGA Convention Yet - Rolling Stone
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. - Yahoo
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Has anyone ever worn leather pants? Are they comfortable?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What kind of lights would you like to use for your home decor?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.